🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a pending law that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.