🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.